![]() Go to the font’s page to get the new one and replace the old one the same way you did when you first installed the font. If you’re using any of these fonts, you have to update the installation code with the new one. Here are the changes that might affect you: Heads up! All of my content has been updated and should now be fixed. ![]() Por favor, não me façam perder o meu tempo. Se você deseja que o tema possua modificações de corpo (colunas, tamanho de posts, lado de sidebar, formato da foto da sidebar, entre outros) haverá um acréscimo de R$4. Nenhum dos modelos acima atende a sua necessidade? Entre em contato.ĪTENÇÃO: As únicas opções de modificações via apparence disponíveis serão para cores e conteúdos textuais. Mas dado que não trabalhamos com dólares e nem mesmo temos dinheiro para jogar fora, eu decidi não passar nem perto de tal faixa de preço. No geral os temas do Tumblr variam de 19$ a 119$ (dólares) e nem mesmo são de uso exclusivo do comprador. Não vejo mal algum em divulgar o meu trabalho ainda mais em tempos tão complicados. maybe we’ll get there and you’ll have an even better method of “going back to the previous reblog” than we did before.Bem, decidi liberar informações em relação à compra de temas exclusivos. i’ve seen a couple of proposed designs, but they never felt right. ![]() My entire time working at tumblr, i’ve wanted a way to make Reblog Graphs work more intuitively as a part of the reblog interface on the dashboard, so you can move “up” and “down” and “back” and “forward” along the reblog tree. With that in mind, i trust that we’ll make some affordance to move “along the reblog chain” like you could before, if we find that it’s truly a needed element of the design. i hope we get a chance to preview them publicly. these are important changes, and they’ll take time to figure out and finesse. a lot of them are things people who use tumblr every day have been asking for forever, so i’m excited about that. There’s a team working on a lot of fixes and tweaks and redesigns of how reblogs are displayed right now, and there are bigger, broader changes being planned. you can see that as a marine biologist, but even they don’t have all the answers. the plankton don’t know about the sharks, and the sharks don’t know about the plankton, but the two are symbiotic. it’s an ecosystem, one that’s too big to see accurately if you’re inside of it. it’s too narrow of a way to think about it, in my opinion. This is a very simple and incomplete example though. not great either, because the fundamental part of the engine would be broken. if all of the power users went away, either the casual users would adapt somehow, or they’d leave too, but it’d take longer, because there’s far more of them. doesn’t matter how dedicated the remaining power users are. if all of the casual users went away, tumblr would basically stop making any money (right now we’re not making enough as it is), and it’d be shut down very quickly. fundamentally, the behaviors are different.Īre the power users keeping the site alive, or are the casual users? the answer is both. then there are casual users who are the majority, and they may use tumblr daily as well, but they’re not performing as many actions as that group of power users. power users are the minority (10%? 20%? on some platforms it’s 1%) but they perform “multiplicative” actions more than others: making posts, reblogging stuff, etc, and they’re very active (as in they use tumblr daily). I usually refer to two groups of people on tumblr (and most platforms): power users and casual users. With that in mind, i guess i’d ask you what you think are the actions and behaviors of “superficial” people versus “dedicated” people. Yes, Google has a music product as well adjacent to YouTube, but why not capitalize on the thing that’s probably supporting what you’re considering the “on purpose” part of the platform? that’s a pretty clever way of taking a large group of peoples’ behavior and essentially paying for everything else, the usage you’re saying is what youtube is “really for”. That’s an interesting case study, because youtube’s response to people uploading music wasn’t to shut that down and ban it, it was to make the default YouTube app experience stop playing videos when you background the app, and make the YouTube Premium paid experience not do that… probably because they knew they were essentially making a music app, without it being a music app. it highlights an important distinction, because if you’re on youtube, how do you know what it’s “for” and what actions are “on purpose”? what does that really mean? how is using youtube “for music” invalid? how is that not also “on purpose”?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |